FBI Director Asks Tech Companies to At least Don't Offer End-to-End Encryption
Encryption is defeating government intelligence agencies to detect
terrorist activities and after the recent ISIS-linked terror attacks in
Paris and California, the issue has once again become a political target
in Washington.
...and meanwhile, Kazakhstan plans to make it Mandatory for its Citizens to Install Internet Backdoor, allowing the government to intercept users' traffic to any secure website and access everything from web browsing history to usernames and passwords.
...and meanwhile, Kazakhstan plans to make it Mandatory for its Citizens to Install Internet Backdoor, allowing the government to intercept users' traffic to any secure website and access everything from web browsing history to usernames and passwords.
FBI: For God's Sake, Don't Use End-to-End Encryption
At a Senate hearing on Wednesday, FBI's Director James Comey
called for tech companies currently providing users with end-to-end
encryption to reconsider "their business model" and simply stop doing
that, reported The Intercept.
Yes, instead of asking companies for a "backdoor" this time,
Comey suggested them to adopt encryption techniques that help federal
agencies intercept and turn over end-to-end encrypted communications
when necessary.
"The government doesn't want a backdoor, but [it] hopes to get to a place where if a judge issues an order, the company figures out how to supply that information to the judge and figures out on its own the best way to do that," said Comey.
Comey: Keep Readable Version of Customers' Messages
End-to-end Encryption is a secure communication that encrypts the
data on the sender's system before passing it to a company server. The
company then passes the encrypted data to the intended recipient, who is
the only person who can decrypt it.
Nobody in between, be an application service provider, an Internet
service provider (ISP), hacker, or even law enforcement officials, can
read the data or tamper with it.
However, Comey is asking for the technology companies to retain a
readable version of that initial data, just in case the authorities need
it.
"There are plenty of companies today that provide secure services to their customers and still comply with court orders," he said. "There are plenty of folks who make good phones [and] are able to unlock them in response to a court order."
Terrorists and Encryption
Moreover, Comey also gave an example of a situation in which law enforcement officials faced obstacle because of encryption.
Also Read: Peerio — End-to-End Encrypted Secure Messenger and File Sharing App.
Also Read: Peerio — End-to-End Encrypted Secure Messenger and File Sharing App.
Here's the example Comey provided:
"In May, when two terrorists attempted to kill a whole lot of people in Garland, Texas, and were stopped by the action of great local law enforcement. That morning, before one of those terrorists, left to try to commit mass murder, he exchanged 109 messages with an overseas terrorist. We have no idea what he said because those messages were encrypted. That is a big problem."
You can watch his full speech at the Senate hearing in the video given below:
So at last, the FBI director did not actually make crystal clear exactly
what measures he wants tech companies to adopt, or whether he had favor
laws to force the companies to do it. But, he made partially clear that
he is not at all satisfied with the current need to encrypt devices.
Comments
Post a Comment